Canon has taken four years to develop the successor to the 5D Mark II.?Now it is there, the EOS 5D Mark II.?It is striking: In the sphere of direct megapixel Nikon EN-El7 competitor enters the Mark III, not before.?On the contrary, your full-frame CMOS image sensor has an almost moderate resolution of 22 megapixels.
The grip on the right side is now more ergonomic shape than the 5D Mark II and provides a firmer grip.?Photographers with larger hands, but the optional Canon battery grip will need to also use the little finger yet to find a stable and comfortable fit.?The bearing surfaces of the fingers are rubberized and thus a comfortable grip.?At the back of the rubber surface was increased in comparison to the Mark II, so that the thumb rests better on the camera.
The keyboard layout has been largely taken over by the Canon nb-7l .If you have four years before a 5D Mark II used, one must first get used to, but what should take no longer than one week.?The mode dial now has a lock button to prevent accidental displacement.Between the trip and even upper dial individually programmable function button has been added.
Spectacular appears, however, the 61-point wide area AF system that is integrated in the flagship EOS-1D EOS X.?It works with 41 cross type sensors and five double-cross-type sensors.?The AF-configurable preferences that were also introduced in the Canon NB-3L EOS 1D X, are to provide additional security in situations where the subject movement is unpredictable.
Improves Canon has the burst rate: The readout speed of eight channels, according to Canon, the basis for image sequences with up to six frames per second at full resolution – either up to 18 RAW or 16,000 jpeg images,using a UDMA-7?compatible memory card, without the need for additional accessories required.?The sensor architecture, the Mark III is also an ISO range 100-25600 – expandable to ISO 50 and ISO 102400 – cover.
The dispute was the 5D Mark II because of its HD video recording function, the good noise performance at high ISO values and the out of studio major, higher megapixel count.?The D700 was still popular and has been praised for their good speed and better autofocus.?With the current battle in the race for the best, semi-professional full-frame camera is much scarcer.Nikon en-el9 with not only, but overtaken at the megapixels even, while Canon’s 5D Mark II offers at first glance, very little changes.?The futurezone the two models has been extensively tested and compared.
The grip on the right side is now more ergonomic shape than the 5D Mark II and provides a firmer grip.?Photographers with larger hands, but the optional Canon battery grip will need to also use the little finger yet to find a stable and comfortable fit.?The bearing surfaces of the fingers are rubberized and thus a comfortable grip.?At the back of the rubber surface was increased in comparison to the Mark II, so that the thumb rests better on the camera.
The keyboard layout has been largely taken over by the Canon nb-7l .If you have four years before a 5D Mark II used, one must first get used to, but what should take no longer than one week.?The mode dial now has a lock button to prevent accidental displacement.Between the trip and even upper dial individually programmable function button has been added.
Spectacular appears, however, the 61-point wide area AF system that is integrated in the flagship EOS-1D EOS X.?It works with 41 cross type sensors and five double-cross-type sensors.?The AF-configurable preferences that were also introduced in the Canon NB-3L EOS 1D X, are to provide additional security in situations where the subject movement is unpredictable.
Improves Canon has the burst rate: The readout speed of eight channels, according to Canon, the basis for image sequences with up to six frames per second at full resolution – either up to 18 RAW or 16,000 jpeg images,using a UDMA-7?compatible memory card, without the need for additional accessories required.?The sensor architecture, the Mark III is also an ISO range 100-25600 – expandable to ISO 50 and ISO 102400 – cover.
The dispute was the 5D Mark II because of its HD video recording function, the good noise performance at high ISO values and the out of studio major, higher megapixel count.?The D700 was still popular and has been praised for their good speed and better autofocus.?With the current battle in the race for the best, semi-professional full-frame camera is much scarcer.Nikon en-el9 with not only, but overtaken at the megapixels even, while Canon’s 5D Mark II offers at first glance, very little changes.?The futurezone the two models has been extensively tested and compared.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar